Search for: "Doctor v. Harrington"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
C.R. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
Sex Offender Registry Board, 05-MBAR-689 NEW HAMPSHIRE None Found FEDERAL · Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
(Trump v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:34 pm
Andela v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
This was the issue presented to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in MTV Transportation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Dec. 10, 2009); Harrington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:34 pm
The case, Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Alex Argotte, M.D. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
V. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:05 am
”] From Harrington v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Some things are just obvious – particularly to doctors. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:12 pm
245. [206] The evidence with respect to the specific care required does not need to be provided by a medical doctor: Jacobsen v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
Harrington won in State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
The Doctor's Dilemma, Author's Preface. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Fulton v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, is a challenge to a Mississippi law which requires that doctors who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a local hospital. [read post]
