Search for: "Doctor v. Harrington"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Lumpkin, 20-7065Issues: (1) Whether, for penalty-phase ineffective assistance of counsel violations, Harrington v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:05 am
”] From Harrington v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
C.R. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
(Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Kindred v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Alex Argotte, M.D. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:12 pm
245. [206] The evidence with respect to the specific care required does not need to be provided by a medical doctor: Jacobsen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Hittson asks, among other things, “[w]hether the Eleventh Circuit has correctly determined that this Court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, is a challenge to a Mississippi law which requires that doctors who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a local hospital. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
Harrington won in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:23 pm
Doctors however render assistance after the surrogate is pregnant. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Some things are just obvious – particularly to doctors. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Dec. 10, 2009); Harrington v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
