Search for: "Doctors Company v. Plummer"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus, at best, Karl has just created a regime of redundant and overlapping liability with the patients stuck in the middle - not knowing whom to believe if doctors and drug companies say different things.The learned intermediary rule thus makes sound practical sense. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Finally, no common-law duty existed to require a drug company to remove its product from the market simply because doctors didn't use it properly:The problem here lies with individual physicians, in certain operating rooms. . . . [read post]
