Search for: "Dodd v. Cox"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Cox Duke (Duke University) and Randall S. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am
Court of Appeals decision came out earlier this week in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
The circumstances are set out fully in a Fifth Witness Statement of Stephen Dodd dated 5th April 2013, a Second Witness Statement of Thomas Core dated 5th April 2013 and two witness statements of the claimant's solicitor Ralph Cox of the firm Fasken Martineau. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 2:32 pm
(Lawson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 5:08 am
There is no suggestion that Mr Cox was involved in the matter." [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
Cox (Southern District of Ohio; decided September 20, 2011). [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 1:55 am
Here is the abstract: The Dodd-Frank Wall... [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The first, Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) concerned the threatened publication of a book about Jacqueline Gold, the chief executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm
Cox, No. 11-451 (S.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Cox, No. 11-451 (S.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:08 pm
Cox for a similar claim in a federal district court in Ohio). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:08 pm
Cox for a similar claim in a federal district court in Ohio). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Cox, 1:11-cv-451 (S.D. [read post]
