Search for: "Dodd v. Hall " Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am by New Books Script
42 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 29 from 2011: HV 875.58 C3 B34 2011 The traffic in babies : cross-border adoption and baby-selling between the United States and Canada, 1930-1972 Karen A. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Read more… or Read more right here… » Here are the first set of cases: Davies v East, January 8, 1788 Ormond v Payne, July 9, 1789 The King v Dodd, May 30, 1808 R v Burdett, November 28, 1820 Collins v Godefroy, January 18, 1831 Vaughan v Menlove, August 2, 1836 Priestly v Fowler, January 17, 1837 Attwood v Small, March 27, 1838 M'Kinnell v Robinson, May 1,… [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
” The Court went on to consider the formula in  R v Hemsley [2010] EWCA Crim 225, which restricts internet use to “job search, study, work, lawful recreation and purchases”. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
Research & resources As noted last week, the 21st edition of ‘McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists’ by Mike Dodd and Mark Hanna has launched. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]