Search for: "Dodge v. Precision Construction Products, Inc."
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
Wang v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
That’s precisely the point – and the only point. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Groupe SEB USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
I would wager the agency struggled to defend in its position in the first place precisely because company names are inherently “identifying” and not intrinsically “commercial. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:44 am
Kenneth Cole Products, Inc., which held that “the section 226.7 payment[] uses the employee’s rate of compensation,” and not the employee’s “regular rate” used for overtime purposes. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
I wrote about that argument in my article The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine (July 29, 2003), where I explained that: In Dodge v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
But while the aggressive regulatory action may have helped the banking industry to dodge a contagion event, it did not necessarily remedy the underlying concerns for many banks. [read post]
