Search for: "Dodson v. United States District Court"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
United States, a dispute over whether a district judge, when resentencing a defendant after remand, must follow the sentencing findings issued by the original sentencing judge. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 8:06 am
Facts: This case (Dodson et al v. [read post]
Federal Court Rules that Subcontractor Duties Are Not Terminated by Contractor’s Modest Underpayment
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
Federal Court Rules that Subcontractor Duties Are Not Terminated by Contractor’s Modest Underpayment
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
Federal Court Rules that Subcontractor Duties Are Not Terminated by Contractor’s Modest Underpayment
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
(P & F) 567(see LexisOne, or e.g Supreme Court of the United States (.pdf))Scott Dodson at the Virginia Law Review writes in Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
United States, the Court will consider whether four key provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, are preempted by federal law. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:48 am
Some may remember United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Cases in which possession and title are inextricably intertwined are reserved for districts courts, which have the power to resolve title disputes. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
United States and the possibility that “overcriminalization actually increases the commission of criminal acts, particularly by white-collar offenders. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am
United States (holding that the statute of limitations in the Court of Claims was mandatory and non-waivable, although avoiding the jurisdictional label) had retroactively recast Bowles as similarly non-jurisdictional. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
” Dodson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
In BMW of North America, Inc v Gore (517 US 559 (1996)), she dissented from another decision reviewing an allegedly excessive punitive-damages award and argued that the Court should ‘resist unnecessary intrusion into an area dominantly of state concern. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Reed (1971), her majority opinion in the VMI gender discrimination case, United States v. [read post]
