Search for: "Doe v. General Hospital of District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The appellate court rejected the FTC’s argument that the Hospital Authority acted as a mere straw-man by citing City of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:20 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States, residents of the District of Columbia have brought an ambitious legal challenge seeking voting representation in Congress. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:42 am by Kara M. Maciel
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) refused to enforce a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision that a hotel unlawfully suspended hospitality workers who engaged in a work stoppage. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
Doe No. 3, supra (quoting Columbia Ins. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Law §§ 13–301 to 13–501 (2013), and the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:53 pm by Lisa Baird
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit last month affirmed the lower court’s ruling in favor of the hospital plaintiffs in Allina Health Services, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
In this regard, the disputed rule was distinguishable from the rulemaking upheld by the Supreme Court in American Hospital Assoc v NLRB. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
We've been keeping an eye on some interesting litigation in the District of Columbia, Iacangelo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
District of Columbia Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 168 F.3d 525, 528 (D.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The recent District of Columbia federal trial court decision upholding the individual mandate breaks little new ground and has many of the same weaknesses as the two previous district court decisions that went the same way. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
” Unlike Daimler, the PLO/PA is not a corporation, but an “unincorporated… foreign governmental organization,” whose activities in the District of Columbia make it “continuously and systematically present in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The District of Columbia does not, however, provide for grief claims. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Backus Hospital, 864 A.2d 1, 18 (Conn. 2005) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).District of Columbia:  Grant v. [read post]