Search for: "Doe 1 et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2023, 2:05 pm by Babak Yousefzadeh and Skyler Hicks
National Collegiate Athletic Association et al., asserting that student-athletes in Pennsylvania, New York, and Connecticut qualify as university “employees” under the FLSA, and thus must be compensated for their time spent related to their athletic activities. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, on behalf of former students-athletes, which is similar to Hubbard II. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Court denied review of two significant cases: ** It refused to hear an appeal by the National Collegiate Athletic Association seeking clarification of when a private organization may be sued for civil rights violations on the theory that it was jointly involved in the actions of a state agency. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Alston, the Court rejected the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s argument that it should have benefited from a “quick look”, restating that “most restraints challenged under the Sherman Act” are subject to the rule of reason.[26] The message from the Court is clear: rules are the exception, not the norm. [read post]