Search for: "Doe 1-20"
Results 21 - 40
of 27,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 2:18 pm
Code § 20-3-170(B). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
Failing to find the language in the Administrative Order which Plaintiff relies on, the Court instead turned to Executive Order 20-91, entered by Florida's Governor on April 1, 2010. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:04 am
Does your hospital follow strict guidelines to reduce the risk of infection for its patients? [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:02 pm
On October 20, 2020, a consortium of U.S. federal financial regulators (Regulators)[1], issued a proposed rule (Proposed Rule) that, if enacted, would codify that mere supervisory guidance that is not the product of notice and comment rulemaking—e.g., interagency statements, advisories, bulletins, policy statements, and FAQs—does not have the force of law. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:14 pm
Does 1-5, 2010 WL 1904530 (D.Colo. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
[1] Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
Sky Billiards, Inc. d/b/a Best Choice Products, 1-17-cv-00069 (NCMD June 20, 2018, Order) (Biggs, USDJ) [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:54 am
(EST), and the second meeting will take place on November 20, 2019, from 8:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:57 am
Commissioner of Environmental Protection - SC18173 (Connecticut Environmental Protection Act- § 22a-20; "On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that (1) she lacks standing under § 22a-16, and (2) § 22a-20 does not provide an independent cause of action. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:39 am
That is approximately 1 in every 20 Americans. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:20 am
Concept papers are due on June 20, 2019. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
Failing to find the language in the Administrative Order which Plaintiff relies on, the Court instead turned to Executive Order 20-91, entered by Florida's Governor on April 1, 2010. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Does 1-41?] [read post]
31 May 2018, 3:45 pm
1)University Of Chicago2)Virginia3)Duke 4)Harvhard5) Stanford round out the top five. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
"1. [read post]
22 May 2022, 1:13 pm
In sentencing issues of first impression concerning receiving and distributing child porn, the 9th holds (1) 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) does not require the defendant to actually receive “valuable consideration” for a sentencing enhancement; and (2) 3014(a)requires a $5000 fine per offense rather than the nature of offense.Dissenting, Wardlaw argues that 3014(a) differs markedly from 3013, which requires an assessment per conviction, and must be interpreted differently.There are… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:03 pm
Department of Energy (DOE), stated that despite the availability of U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:19 am
Does 1-38, No. 13 C 4901, Slip Op. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:50 pm
(reloaded).Law 21 still does not clarify which exemption applies to homes with building permits dated between September 1, 2006 and June 30, 2009. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
CITY OF MISSOULA and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
