Search for: "Doe Corporations" Results 41 - 60 of 51,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 6:04 pm by Tom Smith
Putting aside the fact that neither in logic, nor in law, nor in morals does an individual CEO, let alone the lobbying arm for CEOs, have the ability to “redefine the purpose of a corporation,” it does prompt the question of what the purpose and responsibilities of a corporation actually are, and who decides this. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:43 am by drdiekman
Practice point: The compulsory redemption requirement of Business Corporation Law § 1510 does not extend to a shareholder’s involuntary termination of employment from a professional corporation. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am by Comiter, Singer, Baseman & Braun
A formal definition of a “close” corporation reads a “corporation [that] does not exceed a statutorily defined number of shareholders and is not a public corporation… The main benefit of a close corporation is that it will be exempt from a number of the formal rules which usually govern corporations. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:43 am by Stephen Honig
Others mentioned growing customer and investor focus on corporate diversity. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Paul Caron
Rev. ___ (2018): Does corporate tax planning benefit shareholders? [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Does it just mean the set of legal rules and norms addressing the conduct of directors and officers of a corporation? [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:05 pm by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
When nonresident members of a corporate group, usually the parent company, should expect to be subjected to the jurisdiction of Pennsylvania courts when one of the entities, usually the subsidiary, is based or does business in the state. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Yun Jeong Choi (Yonsei University) and Kyoung Soo Hahn (Yonsei University) offer much needed empirical woprk on cartels in Korea in their article HOW DOES A CORPORATE LENIENCY PROGRAM AFFECT CARTEL STABILITY? [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am by Cari Rincker
    The post Does the “Corporate Veil” Really Protect Your Personal Assets? [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:45 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: In many cases of criminality within large corporations, senior management does not... [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Caroline Bradley
But improving the rules about corporate criminality does not require abandoning efforts to sanction individual criminality. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The latest study I've seen in this highly contested field says that diversity doesn't improve corporate performance or profitability: This article examines the debate within corporate governance about the appointment of female non? [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
Four years ago, I wrote about an unpublished decision by the Court of Appeal concerning shareholder inspection rights under the California General Corporation Law. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
While directors and officers are vested with almost unlimited discretion to make business decisions, that discretion does not extend to corporate lawbreaking. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
While directors and officers are vested with almost unlimited discretion to make business decisions, that discretion does not extend to corporate lawbreaking. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
SB 1168 does not allow the Secretary of State to cancel "offensive" business entities based on their names, but it does allow cancellation of entities that were created to promote or conduct an "illegitimate" object or purpose. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:04 pm
Standing is a legal term that ponders what legal interest does this Corporation have that would entitle this Corporation to butt into this couple’s divorce? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 905 (2018) (reviewed by Ari Glogower (Ohio State) here): Does corporate tax planning benefit shareholders? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:11 pm by LindaMBeale
In other words, the public does not support “revenue neutral” corporate tax reform. [read post]