Search for: "Doe Defendant 5" Results 81 - 100 of 22,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Docket Navigator
The University of Phoenix, Inc., et al., 2-09-cv-00555 (VAED February 5, 2014, Order) (Miller, M.J.) [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
By Line Below: The Southern District of Georgia does remarkably little to provide for indigent defendants. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:17 am by Docket Navigator
"Plaintiff does not present any evidence or legal authority to support its argument that the Amazon FCs are the physical, geographical location of [defendant]. . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:28 pm
Attorney, Tim Racicot, opened the afternoon by defending the Government's theory of its case. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:01 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
July 5, 2017), plaintiff filed an HCLA claim against a single physician under whose care her husband was at the time he committed suicide. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
In most cases, a personal injury attorney does not get paid unless you win the case. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
As a matter of first impression in the Ninth Circuit, the Court of Appeals addressed “whether substitution of a named defendant for a Doe defendant in a California state court action commences a civil action against the new named defendant within the meaning of CAFA.” Slip Opn., at 4-5. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:33 am by Alisha Parmar
An order for security can be an important defendant’s tool since a plaintiff who is ordered to, but does not post, security for costs will be precluded from pursuing its claims. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:15 am by SHG
How does a judge decide that a sentence of 17 years is proper? [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for clarification"[Ed.… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:06 am
" If the council does not get its full request, Mike Mears, the council's director, said, "there will be layoffs and we'll meet to decide how to cut an already bare-bones budget by $5 million. [read post]