Search for: "Doe Defendant One" Results 101 - 120 of 79,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 7:21 am by Docket Navigator
Given [defendant's] own litigation misconduct, it does not have 'clean hands' sufficient to render this an 'exceptional case'. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 3:30 am by Lumen N. Mulligan
One exception to this scheme, the forum-defendant rule, bars removal “if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:08 pm by Hirsch & Lyon Accident Law
  It does not matter that the defendant was “unlucky” that their actions affected a fragile victim — the defendant must bear the burden. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 10:02 am by John Floyd
However, this does not mean that the defendant is immediately released. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:02 pm
Donahue Peebles and granting an indefinite stay of this entire action against all defendants pending the completion of the bankruptcy proceeding of only one defendant, PADC Marketing, LLC. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:14 am by James Pooley
But one happened yesterday, as the Senate voted 87-0 to approve the Defend Trade Secrets Act, S.1890. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am by Stevie Phillips
  It's one thing to find that the defendant constructively possessed the cocaine in the co-defendant's car. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm by Jamie Markham
In either case, the law does not clearly address who is responsible for transporting the defendant to trial, and sheriffs’ offices on either side of a request sometimes disagree about it. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:27 am by texastriallawyers
It is a dubious distinction and one that Houston officials are trying hard to rectify. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:22 am
Footnote one of the opinion states: "To the date of this writing the Defendant, who has refused to provide his name, has not been affirmatively identified and is referred to as 'John Doe.'" [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 7:29 am by Docket Navigator
Simply because [a plaintiff] is successful and well-known in the industry and Defendant purchased Plaintiffs’ products for resale prior to the alleged infringement, does not mean that Defendant had knowledge of Plaintiffs’ patents, and it certainly does not necessarily follow that [defendant's] conduct is so egregious as to warrant increased damages. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:04 am
Why, the reporter asked, does that matter? [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's my thinking: I appreciate that, when defendant necessarily explains his relationship to the plaintiff (e.g., if he is her former husband, just to give one possible example), that may end up making plaintiff's identity clear to those who know the defendant. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bruce Nye
One of the more complex questions of California tort law, with one of the more counter-intuitive answers,  can best be posed this way:  If plaintiff sues ten defendants in tort, nine of them settle and the plaintiff gets a verdict against the tenth, what credit, or set-off, does that tenth defendant get for the settlements? [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:01 pm by Robert Chesney
 Obviously, policy considerations loom largest in such a scenario; no one wants a U.S. [read post]