Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 21 - 40
of 8,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 5:37 am
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.129.8.71 Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01520-SEB-DMLFile Date: Friday, September 20, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.129.162.170 Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01518-WTL-TABFile Date: Friday, September 20, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:00 am
., No. 20-10032-WGY, 2023 WL 5984517, at *1 (D. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
Failing to find the language in the Administrative Order which Plaintiff relies on, the Court instead turned to Executive Order 20-91, entered by Florida's Governor on April 1, 2010. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
On January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court rejected a strategy recently used by some defendants to defeat class actions in their infancy. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 pm
[This case was under submission for two years; it was 3-1-3.] [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Making the driver wait 20 minutes for the drug dog to show up was not by consent, and it was unreasonble. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:19 pm
March 20, 2012): Defendant offers a series of contentions for why disclosure is warranted, including: the need to challenge the basis for the warrant; the fact that the informant is the only person who claims to have seen Defendant in possession of the firearm; and the need to investigate Defendant's theory that the informant played a role in framing Defendant. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
Failing to find the language in the Administrative Order which Plaintiff relies on, the Court instead turned to Executive Order 20-91, entered by Florida's Governor on April 1, 2010. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 12:35 am
Internet Security, et al., 1-04-cv-01199 (DED August 20, 2009, Memorandum Opinion) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
Use of handcuffs during a stop and frisk does not necessarily convert the stop into an arrest. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
CITY OF MISSOULA and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
If the DOJ does intervene, it has the authority to dismiss the lawsuit by giving the relator […] The post Supreme Court to Rule on False Claims Act Whistleblowers’ Right to Sue, Reuters, article by Abbye Alexander, Christopher Tellner, Talya Van Embden , 1-20-2023 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
August 20, 2008): As the district court properly concluded, Reed's case does not fall within the ambit of Randolph. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00838-JMS-DML File Date: Monday, June 18, 2012 Plaintiff: Millennium TGA Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Does 1-41?] [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:18 am
Does 1-1000, No. 10 C 5604, Slip Op. [read post]
