Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The court observed that the defendant (1) stayed in his lane, (2) did not hit the sidewalk, (3) did not exceed any posted speed limit, and (4) did not risk a collision with another vehicle or a pedestrian. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The court observed that the defendant (1) stayed in his lane, (2) did not hit the sidewalk, (3) did not exceed any posted speed limit, and (4) did not risk a collision with another vehicle or a pedestrian. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
id=301050 You can’t waive bar on removal on diversity grounds by in-state defendant. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/20/01/182892P.pdf Cars that copy music from CDs don’t violate Audio Home Recording Act of 1992. https://cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/CE35799597CD3A54852584FD00593251/$file/18-7141-1825918.pdf Condition precedent precluded formation of pipeline partnership. http://txcourts.gov/media/1445666/170862.pdf Emails about purchase of pipeline… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
August 20, 2010), adopted 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
Or, as a Canadian court put it:I do agree . . . that mere proof of the existence of a Facebook profile does not entitle a party to gain access to all material placed on that site. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
The district court judge who conducted the trial and who found the defendant guilty -- the judge who does not get reversed -- is Judge Snow. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
., No. 1:20-CV-00449 (M.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
” Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a)(2). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Defendant sought a ton of information about the investigative techniques used against him to potentially challenge the searches, and the court decides that Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) does not require the government to create information not already in existence. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:45 am
§ 20-1-119(a). [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:41 am
May 20, 2009).* [This is it for today] [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:07 am
Considering the jurisprudence, such a belief is not reasonable nor does it justify the failure to seek a warrant before searching. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:46 am
Does 1-20, 2017 WL 4326360, No. 17-810 (D. [read post]
22 May 2022, 1:13 pm
In sentencing issues of first impression concerning receiving and distributing child porn, the 9th holds (1) 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) does not require the defendant to actually receive “valuable consideration” for a sentencing enhancement; and (2) 3014(a)requires a $5000 fine per offense rather than the nature of offense.Dissenting, Wardlaw argues that 3014(a) differs markedly from 3013, which requires an assessment per conviction, and must be interpreted… [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:36 pm
We offer a no-obligation consultation and can be reached by calling 1-866-422-7222. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 4:51 am
The officer in this case followed the defendant to his home suspecting that the defendant was DUI. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
., Civil Action No. 20-1163-RGA (D.Del. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:18 am
November 20, 2009).* Defendant tossed his gun while fleeing, and this was like Hodari D. and there was no seizure because of his flight. [read post]
