Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-10"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 5:11 pm
The court may revoke the DOSA sentence if the defendant does not comply with its requirements. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:37 am
The court noted that Booker invalidated § 3553(b)(1), which does not cross- reference § 3582(c). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:32 pm
Reid, Case No. 286784, holding that a circuit court does not have jurisdiction to try a defendant on a misdemeanor criminal charge, where the original accompanying felony charge was dismissed before trial. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
Geier, No. 2-10-0112, slip op. at 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:54 pm
The discovery rule does not apply. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
D) [7]Ibid at para. 10 [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
" Id., 2012 WL 566140, at *10. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
• Defendants: Cellsight Technologies, Inc.; Does 1-50 Infringement of U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:12 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Oakley, Inc. of Foothill Ranch, California, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, Swami Property Sunman Inc., d/b/a Sunman BP of Sunman, Indiana, Chirag Patel, an individual, and Does 1-10 (collectively “Defendants”) infringed its rights in United States Trademarks as seen below: Plaintiff is seeking judgment against Defendants, preliminary… [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm
Oct. 10, 2012). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:04 am
Does 1–10, No. 4:13–CV–139, 2014 WL 1310310 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:49 pm
” Slip op. at 1. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
S & N Locating Services, LLC et al, 2-13-cv-00346 (VAED August 10, 2016, Order) (Davis, USDJ) [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:36 pm
Defendants must file a joint notice designating the Lead Defendant ten (10) days prior to the deadline to exchange proposed terms for construction (pursuant to P.R. 4-1). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:32 am
Previous editions only evaluated larger ISPs with 10% or more of the market. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:00 am
To adequately state a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and successfully implement Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to show: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:43 pm
Morales, No. 09-30047 (1-5-10). [read post]
