Search for: "Doe Defendants Nos. 1 and 2"
Results 41 - 60
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 6:17 am
ERISA's anti-alienation provision, found in section 206(d)(1) of ERISA, under which plan benefits may not be assigned or alienated, does not change this result. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
Patent Nos. 10,898,574, 10,702,600, and 10,933,127. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:08 pm
(2) Did defendant waive her right to make a renewed motion to set aside the default by withdrawing her first motion in return for agreement to temporarily postpone the sale? [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
The defendants moved for summary disposition on two grounds: (1) Bush failed to file a NOI that complied with the requirements of MCL §600.2912b, and (2) Bush failed to wait the required 182 days after serving the defendants with the NOI before filing his complaint. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:04 pm
Code § 55-7B-1, et seq., does not preclude application of the Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Or is this a case where the defendant ‘threatened to infringe’ the trade mark (Art. 130(1) EUTMR), depending on the further intentions of the defendant? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
COA19-66 Filed: 1 October 2019 Wilkes County, Nos. 16 CRS 54383, 16 CRS 53498, 17 CRS 436 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Subsections (2) to (8) of clause 5 make amendments to Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the 1996 Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Dekalb County, ARB Nos. 13-080, -085, ALJ Nos. 2006-WPC-2 and 3 (ARB Mar. 30, 2015), both the Complainants and the Respondent appealed the ALJ’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs on the Complainants’ FWPCA complaint. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
Nos. 001, 002.Supreme Court, New York County.September 4, 2018.DECISION AND ORDERSALIANN SCARPULLA, Judge. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
The Fourth Circuit Court also rejected recovery on the theory of estoppel, since (1) estoppel cannot be used to vary the terms of the Plan, under which-in this case- the life insurance benefits were not payable and (2) McCravy did not reasonably rely on any mistatement by MetLife. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:55 am
Code, which provides that “[a]ny civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district [1] where the defendant resides, or [2] where the defendant commits acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
A National Labor Relations Board administrative law judge found that an employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by: 1) requiring applicants to waive their right to bring class claims, and 2) opposing an employee's class and collective allegations based upon that waiver. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:32 pm
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case Nos. 09-16245 and 09-16796. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Patent Nos. 7,366,694 (“’694 patent”) and 7,680,728 (“’728 patent”). [2] Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Generally, in order to establish a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, a movant must meet the requirements of a two-prong test by proving that: 1) counsel’s performance was deficient and 2) the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
§ 24-2-1-2(8), (9). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:03 am
Patent Nos. 6,926,907 and 8,557,285. 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:45 pm
Id. at 1-2. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
Ronald Eugene Reynolds v The State of Texas, Nos. 08-15-00372-CR; 08-15-00373-CR; 08-15-00374-CR; 08-15-00375-CR; 08-15-00376-CR (Nov. 29, 2017). [read post]
