Search for: "Doe Distributing Companies 1-20" Results 1 - 20 of 1,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The agency’s more cautious approach to the designation of Russian oligarchs was surely a deliberate decision, likely taken in light of the extensive multinational commercial holdings of many oligarchs and the companies they control and the potential for disruption of markets outside Russia. [read post]
As we previously outlined here, MAUCRSA requires commercial cannabis licensees to enter into Labor Peace Agreements (“LPAs”)[1] with bona fide labor organizations in order to receive and maintain licenses to cultivate, distribute, transport, store, manufacture, process, and sell cannabis in the state of California. [read post]
This note summarises ten key issues enterprises active in the EU should know about the Directive. 1. [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bontiea Goss, his wife and former chief operating officer of the same company, was sentenced to three years behind bars. [read post]
In the context of LLC members, the Illinois Limited Liability Company Act (805 ILCS 180/35-1) provides for the dissolution of the company upon the application by a member or transferee of a distributional interest, upon entry of a judicial decree that the managers or those members in control of the company have acted or are acting in a manner that is oppressive and was, is, or will be directly harmful to the applican]. [read post]
CS3D lays down rules on obligations for large companies regarding actual and potential adverse impacts on the environment and human rights for their business chain of activities which covers the upstream business partners of the company and partially the downstream activities, such as distribution or recycling. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
(Yes the budget was adopted by Senate Bill 360, but the available version does Not include the Conference Committee amendments.) [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:43 am by centerforartlaw
If a company or individual created and owns the Poetry Camera, they might hold the copyright to the poems it produces. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”) and its affiliates (together “Yellow”) —were a transportation company that was among the largest freight trucking companies in the country. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Yet, it does not justify an interpretation of the Constitution that tolerates let alone sustains corporate infringement of individual rights and encroachment on governmental powers. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Merely because the images might convey “an ideological or provocative message” does not make them nonfactual: A fact does not become “value-laden” merely because the fact drives a reaction. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
 In a Press Release distributed 15 March 2024, the Council of Europe distributed the following statement and announcement by Secretary General Marija Pejčinović Burić on the occasion of the finalisation of the Convention's ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence: “This first-of-a-kind treaty will ensure that the rise of Artificial Intelligence upholds Council of Europe legal standards in human rights, democracy and the rule of law. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm by Joshua Smeltzer
Furthermore, the Tax Court found that that the Limited Partner Exception does not apply to a partner who is limited in name only. [read post]