Search for: "Doe Message Sender"
Results 41 - 60
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Contrary to this representation, the lawsuit alleges that "When a user composes a Facebook message and includes a link to a third party website (a "URL"), the Company scans the content of the Facebook message, follows the enclosed link, and searches for information to profile the message-sender's web activity. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
” Additionally, the as-written rule provides that “[t]o the extent that the text recipient has consented to several categories of text messages from the text sender, the confirmation message may request clarification as to whether the revocation request was meant to encompass all such messages; the sender must cease all further texts for which consent is required absent further clarification that the recipient wishes to continue to receive… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:58 am
” Reasoning from cases relying on California’s stricter anti-spam law, the court concluded that when a sender “intentionally uses privately registered domain names in its headers that neither disclose the true sender’s identity on their face nor permit the recipient to readily identify the sender . . . such header information is deceptive. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
This ignores that law enforcement can and does conduct investigations involving encrypted messages, which can be reported by users and accessed from either the sender or recipient’s devices. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:44 pm
With all of this sexting in the news, it is important as an employee to know: when does sexting become workplace sexual harassment? [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
Like a call to voicemail or an answering machine, the sending of a text message by itself does not demand that the recipient take any action. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
Put another way, if A sends a text message to B, and the police discover that text message during a search of B’s phone, does A have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the search? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:39 pm
Does that qualify as spam? [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:50 am
Does that number appear on all the pages of the exhibit? [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Canada’s Anti-Spam Law, more commonly known as CASL, generally provides that a sender must obtain the consent of a recipient before sending a “commercial electronic message,” or “CEM,” to that recipient. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 1:36 pm
In Nujuten, the Federal Circuit determined that a propagating signal cannot be patented because it is does not qualify as patentable subject matter. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 10:32 am
But it does not require that you bow to these efforts, destroy what you received or refrain from using the information. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
On this issue, the court agreed with the FCC, which had earlier ruled that traditional agency is not the only route to holding a third party (non-sender) liable for text messages. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
In my last blog post, I discussed a significant legal issue that had cropped up recently in a Morris County courtroom: whether the sender of a text message can be responsible if she texts someone she knows is driving and then the recipient of the text gets into an accident and injures someone. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:37 pm
In fact, the virality of a message does not change the privacy and due process rights of the original sender nor the presumption of innocence, a core requirement of international human rights law. [read post]
12 May 2014, 5:59 pm
In fact, the FTC said that there was a very easy work-around method to allow recipients to screen shot messages without notifying the sender. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:20 pm
In the age of email, text messaging, and Twitter, litigation focused on the sending of unwanted fax messages sounds old-fashioned. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:34 am
By anchoring the requisite physicality in the screen display (“the physical nature of the light emitted from the GIF”), the court implies that any electronic message that directly contributes to a physical injury (say, a message encouraging someone to cut themselves who actually does it) would constitute a battery because the recipient’s eyes physically processed the message’s light/dark patterns. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Underlying this consideration is the element of control; . . . when the recipient receives the message, the sender relinquishes control over what becomes of that message on the recipient's phone. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am
As we’ve noted, much of the focus has shifted to text-message-spam and the TCPA. [read post]
