Search for: "Doe No 8 v. Epstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
” Epstein cites Frisby v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:56 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:56 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
Epstein v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision, filed April 8, 2015, in Golden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
Epstein School, Inc v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
Doe, 977 A.2d 941, 948 n.5 (D.C. 2009). [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:38 am
However, the plaintiff had the capacity to commence this action on his mother’s behalf as her attorney-in-fact pursuant to the power of attorney (see Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d 726, 726). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:13 pm
Epstein ed.1935). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
The better question is whether traditional standing doctrine makes any sense in the context presented by the attacks on Proposition 8 and DOMA (the below channels a very fine commentary written by Richard Epstein many years ago). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision, filed April 8, 2015, in Golden v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision, filed April 8, 2015, in Golden v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:01 am
Here's the BIO in Harmon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:14 pm
" The first instance of the comment that I can find in the legal literature appears in an article by Richard Epstein [92 Yale Law Journal 1435 (1983)], and some legal academics associate the comment with Professor Epstein, whose facility in workshops is legendary. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Defense Attorney: Robert Epstein 2. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Constitution does not guarantee the right to abortion (overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
Epstein is the Laurence A. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
” The Court Grants Reargument Last March, however, the Epstein case took on new life following a motion to reargue by Epstein who argued that Steinbeck was overruled sub silentio by the Court of Appeals’ 2018 opinion in Congel v Malfitano, a wrongful partnership dissolution case that I wrote about here, in which the Court, quoting from a 1939 Court of Appeals opinion in Lanier v Bowdoin, wrote: The partners of either a general or limited partnership,… [read post]
