Search for: "Doe et al v. University Of The South" Results 81 - 100 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet, Harvard University, session chairGraham Dutfield, The evolving role of branding in pharmaceutical management: how should competition law respond? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See Authority to Delay a Project Does Not Make the Project Discretionary. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm by Kelsey Farish
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:19 am by Dina Townsend
It is this limited approach that has informed the Human Rights Committee’s decisions in cases like Länsman et al v Finland (1994) where it found that the Sami’s cultural rights are only infringed when the environment is damaged to the point of jeopardizing their survival. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Watsonville, et al. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1059: A city acting as its own ALUC is subject to all of the substantive requirements under the State Aeronautics Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]