Search for: "Doe et al v. Walker et al" Results 21 - 40 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 7:28 am by Docket Navigator
Oxygen Frog, LLC et al, 4-16-cv-00336 (FLND May 28, 2018, Order) (Walker, USDJ) [read post]
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
Rainwater (Fifth Circuit 1977) and more (LaFave et al.), Walker v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Once this burden is discharged, if the record does in fact bear out that no genuine dispute exists, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party, who must set forth affirmative evidence and specific facts showing there is a genuine dispute on that issue. [read post]