Search for: "Doe et al v. Walker et al" Results 101 - 120 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Once this burden is discharged, if the record does in fact bear out that no genuine dispute exists, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party, who must set forth affirmative evidence and specific facts showing there is a genuine dispute on that issue. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
  Proportionality seems to have been suggested by Lords Hope and Scott at least as part of the test, but the rest were mostly unclear on the point although Lord Mance and Lord Walker did suggest that any differences had been narrowed. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
__________________________ [1] Redish et al., supra note 2 at 644-646. [2] See e.g., Bisaillon v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46)   Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP)   India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]