Search for: "Doe v Macfarland"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The court says: Neither does the fact that MacFarland makes money from his guidance, either by running ads or receiving promotional kickbacks. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:48 am
RainSoft v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:08 am
Wickfire, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:47 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:12 am
Russo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Plaintiff retorts that this argument "just does not make sense" because the witnesses are medical professionals—or medical students—who often use the name "Jane Doe" to refer to unidentified female patients. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:06 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3, mostly for the portion of the case dealing with the KGB statement, where Justice MacFarland does an excellent job discussing the issues in that area. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Inco Limited, 2011 ONCA 628 DATE: 20111007 DOCKET: C52491 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Doherty, MacFarland JJ.A. and Hoy J. [read post]
