Search for: "Doe v. Anker"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
But what does it mean for law? [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:05 pm
Supreme Court's 5-4 decision this week in the Apple v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:27 pm
(Evan Kline was one of the folks who did the awesome Galactic Empire v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
N.Y. 2003); Anker Energy Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:10 am
The civil law relating to clamping was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest.[2000] EWCA Civ 106.In the Vine case, the earlier case of Arthur v Anker and another [1997] QB 564 is discussed.The Vine caseThe appellant in this case was Helen Vine. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
Ndayshimiye v. [read post]
