Search for: "Doe v. Bd. of Elections"
Results 181 - 200
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
" Lowery v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Bd. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia October 28, 2011 Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
Dennis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
Lastly, ruled the Court: Although the amount of attorneys’ fees exceeds the amount of the ultimate judgment, it does not exceed the amount of attorneys’ fees claimed. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Reading this paragraph, one realizes that the USPAP does not offer much guidance on determining a cut-off date. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Bd., (December 15, 2021) 2021 Cal.App.LEXIS 1052. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938). [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
State Bd. of Health (1902) (upholding Louisiana's right to quarantine passengers aboard vessel—even where all were healthy—against a Fourteenth Amendment challenge); Prince v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., No. 21-1249 (D.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Outline of the Proposal Maryland lawmakers were looking for revenue, but the original inspiration for S.B. 2 was never about revenue; it was a proposal for the punitive federal taxation of targeted advertising as a response to perceived exploitation of customer data and invasions of privacy, especially when used nefariously to influence U.S. politics or elections. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
See, e.g., Weidner v. [read post]
