Search for: "Doe v. Bd. of Elections" Results 81 - 100 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 1:35 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181, 211-12 (2008) (Souter, J., dissenting) [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Nor was it clear that data on time spent and hourly rates was required to prove up attorneys fees when the attorney had not elected to use the lodestar-method to substantiate the reasonableness of the amount of fees sought under other fee-shifting statutes. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm by Dan
Harper v Virginia Bd. of Elections Even with the new amendment, states, like Virginia, continued their poll tax practices because the amendment did not specifically speak to state elections. [read post]
The appellate court first held the suit was ripe for review, rejecting the County’s claim that “the controversy does not apply to a specific set of facts” as required in Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]