Search for: "Doe v. Bd. of Regents"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Board of Regents (1967), and Rutan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The court limited review to the following issue: Under what circumstances, if any, does the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Detroit Bd. of Ed., 431 U.S. 209 . [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The court limited review to the following issue: Under what circumstances, if any, does the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Board of Trustees of California State University (2010) 48 Cal.4th 760 (Runyon); State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of N.Y., 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of N.Y., 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967). [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
It does not require governmental interference with “support or advocacy. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:08 am
College Bd. of Regents, No. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Bd. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:20 pm
Sci., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Litig., 432 F.3d 1, 5-6 (1st Cir. 2005); In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d. 305, 316-20 (3d Cir. 2008); Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
”* The Commissioner said that the Board of Regents "does not have the ability" to reject or veto a “recommendation” of another charter entity or modify a proposed charter submitted by such entity, citing Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt UFSD., et al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Texas Sys., 458 F.3d 1335, 1339-40 (Fed. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Board of Regents,[4] a case decided before New York law expressly prohibited fee-splitting. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85, 113 (1984), research joint ventures such as the one between Philips and Sony can have significant procompetitive features, and it is now well settled that an agreement among joint venturers to pool their research efforts is analyzed under the rule of reason. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
Cir. 2006); see Bd. of Regents v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:23 am
Bd. of Regents (1984-2 Trade Cases ¶66,139), agreements among sports teams about whether and how they will participate in the marketplace are subject to scrutiny under the Sherman Act, Section 1. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
