Search for: "Doe v. Blue Shield of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:58 pm
But does so only prospectively; it says its going to pay for the existing stuff, but nothing in the future.Eventually, plaintiff becomes unhappy with some stuff that Blue Shield's not paying for (Blue Shield says some of this stuff is from a preexisting condition), and files suit. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:37 pm
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:01 am
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Blue Shield of California, 189 Cal.App.4th 1117 (Nov. 5, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) stated without analysis that a UCL "fraudulent" prong claim predicated on an omission (as opposed to an affirmative misrepresentation) does not lie absent a duty to disclose. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:37 pm
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
In Levine v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:32 pm
Blue Shield of California, 10-15595. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
Blue Shield The Rea decision is a very important decision in California. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
Levine, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District agreed with Blue Shield. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:33 pm
Levine, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District agreed with Blue Shield. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:07 am
Blue Shield of California, 2010 WL 4369797 (Cal. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Blue Shield of California Life & Health (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1123 (Diverse Facts and Legal Arguments Concerning Equitable Defenses in UCL Claims Do Not Bar Class Certification). [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 3:00 pm
Blue Shield of California Life & Health (2007) __ Cal.App.4th __. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
Blue Shield of California is a judicial review of a plan administrator's denial of a claim for reimbursement of medical treatment. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:24 pm
And neither, apparently, does the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:18 am
Blue Shield of California, and Rea v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:10 pm
The Ninth Circuit stated: Harlick’s Plan does not itself require that Blue Shield pay for residential care at Castlewood for her anorexia nervosa. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:32 pm
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Golinski's, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Service Plan obtained through the Administrative Office of U.S. [read post]
