Search for: "Doe v. Cambridge Public Schools" Results 41 - 60 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
We all sign a variety of documents with consequences: applications for school and work and money; agreements to buy, sell or lease; cheques and notes and promises to pay. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
The President does (Nixon v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
| Google cannot hide behind its algorithms, German court finds | Does the InfoSoc Directive envisage digital exhaustion? [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
This exercise also involves considering whether reportage would be in the “public interest” (see Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and PJS v NGN Ltd). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Privacy and Police Investigations: ZXC v Bloomberg (2021) Cambridge Law Journal, Forthcoming, N. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Dale Carpenter
Texas law requires children who attend public schools to begin their days with this trifecta: the Pledge of Allegiance, the Texas Pledge (“Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state, under God, one and indivisible”), and a minute of silence to “reflect, pray, meditate, or engage in any other silent activity that is not likely to interfere with or distract another student. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
| IT Law Summer School returns to Cambridge with an IPKat discount | Is imitation the sincerest form of flattery? [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Concerning employees of a non-for-profit working in “before school” and “after school” childcare programs serving public school districts - Andrea T. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Theory II   Brad Greenberg Columbia Law School Bizarro Copyright  Does having lots of different antennas in one place v. all over the place make a difference to whether there is public performance? [read post]