Search for: "Doe v. Catholic Relief Services"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
See Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
And in Gillette v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The aim of this contribution is to explore what Hobby Lobby might mean going forward for religious non-profits (such as Catholic universities, hospitals, and social service agencies) seeking relief from the HHS contraceptive mandate. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
The State has explained that it took that action in response to this Court's recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Some 43 Catholic groups have sued.Professional Services Exclusion: PROPERTY MANAGER GETS NO COVERAGE FOR FATAL APARTMENT FIRE, Golden Eagle Ins. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:09 pm
Catholic Relief Services, 618 F. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
HHS, No. 13-5368, and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
. and does not play an integral and vital part in the overall production or marketing of [products]”); Shepard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Jaycees, as well as a 2020 Second Circuit case New Hope Family Services v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
" Does v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:49 am
Finally, the relief he sought under RLUIPA is unavailable to him.In Young v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
For example in Doe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
Ten weeks ago, acting on an emergency application for injunctive relief in the COVID-19 case of Tandon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
This post is the third installment in my series on Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
How does this case relate to Section A? [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:24 pm
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am
That Second Circuit ruling has now been stayed by the Supreme Court, which holds that the order likely violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.The case is Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
