Search for: "Doe v. Chafee"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 11:40 am
George Wallace would have been an even better namesake, but Wallace's infamous stand in the schoolhouse door did not come until a decade after Lincoln Chafee was born.So now Lincoln Chafee wants to keep a murderer out of the hands of the federal government because that government wants to enforce a law that Chafee happens to disagree with, the law providing for capital punishment for certain federal offenses resulting in death.Sheri Qualters has this story in… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:07 am
The post Devillier v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:57 pm
Here is a note from the forthcoming edition of Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies, my casebook with Emily Sherwin: NOTE ON GOVERNMENT PLAINTIFFS IN EQUITY Does it matter that the plaintiff is the government? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Rhode Island does not have the death penalty, and Chafee has said prosecutors want to try Pleau federally to make it a possible punishment. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
I, § 2. 3 Moreau v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:47 am
As recently as 2010, the Supreme Court declared in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 pm
See, e.g., Bracy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:52 pm
In the recent 2-1 decision of Knight v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:48 am
"Rhode Island v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
See CIAS, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:47 pm
In the Court’s last term in the case of CALPERS v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:27 am
Mulligan Law Firm v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:57 am
The ruling in USA v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited opinion in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:23 pm
Today, the en banc First Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
IMS Health, he cited United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:11 pm
” See York Prods., Inc. v. [read post]