Search for: "Doe v. County of Suffolk"
Results 241 - 260
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 11:28 am
In a 2006 court decision called Foti v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:15 pm
In Shaw v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:19 pm
See People v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:35 pm
In March 2017, a judge in Suffolk County, possibly for the first time in this state, granted custody of a child to three people. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Austin (pictured) who was appointed to the appellate bench in 2009 after serving ten years as trial judge in the Commercial Division of the Nassau County Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:33 pm
This Court has the highest regard for its sister Family Courts in Suffolk County and New York County. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
Suffolk Co.1970). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
"Does the nation's highest court have bigger things to fret about than six-dozen 19-inch fish? [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council, heard 8-9 February 2017. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council, heard 8-9 February 2017. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am
Plaintiffs are defendants in Onondaga, Ontario, Schuyler, Suffolk and Washington counties who have encountered these problems. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
After the Superior Court Department, Suffolk County Massachusetts convicted Darren Dyette of “possession of a firearm and carrying a loaded firearm” in violation of Massachusetts General Laws 269 § 10, he appealed. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
A primer on the local regulation of genetically modified crops. 43 Suffolk U.L. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter observed that in Bast v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Let's take a look at the three decisions:Mehraban v. [read post]
The Oral Partnership Operating as a Corporation: Is it a Partnership? A Corporation? Can it be Both?
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am
Rule #3: [T]he existence of an oral agreement is generally a question of fact which cannot be summarily determined on a motion to dismiss (see Martin v Cohen, 17 Misc 3d 1116 [A] [Sup Court, Suffolk County 2007]). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:23 am
In Fritch v Bron (74 Misc 3d 1217 [A] [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Mar. 1, 2022]), Justice Emerson considered, but ultimately rejected as inapplicable under the particular facts of the case, three of the five theories under New York law for binding nonsignatories to arbitration agreements. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
In February 2017, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition against the mother alleging that she derivatively neglected the child. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
