Search for: "Doe v. Department of Professional Regulation"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 2:45 am
Co. v Shearson Lehman Hutton, 84 NY2d 309, 317-319) does not apply here. [read post]
24 May 2019, 5:00 am
The post Department of Labor Issues Proposal for Joint Employer Regulation appeared first on Lipsky Lowe LLP. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
In Inter-Cooperative Exchange v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
The post Auer v Robbins Established Deference to Agency’s Interpretation of Its Own Regulations appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:18 am
“Nor does the Department have the authority to categorically exclude those who perform ‘bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity’ duties based on salary level alone. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:18 am
“Nor does the Department have the authority to categorically exclude those who perform ‘bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity’ duties based on salary level alone. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
Wang v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
In Beck v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
In respect of the first and third categories of irregular migrant, although the EU does not have the competence to regulate irregular employment, the EU has indirectly regulated irregular employment by prohibiting employers operating in the EU from employing irregular migrants.[22] Thus, under EU law it is not unlawful per se for an irregular migrant to work and potentially even benefit from the necessary guarantees surrounding work, such as the recognition of their… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:39 pm
” Further, the Department argues that every circuit to consider the issue has upheld the salary-level test as a permissible component of the EAP regulations. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:03 am
Pignataro v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:00 pm
" Bothell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 10:30 am
" The IRS sought to regulate such refund claims under Circular 230 regulations and under 31 USC 330 which gives the IRS authority to regulate what that statute terms "representatives" of taxpayers who "practice before" the Treasury Department (which includes the IRS). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 1:30 pm
The Department of Labor issued 762 pages of regulations covering the FMLA. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:57 pm
Waiver of Rights: Taylor v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 7:32 am
In another case, Department of Business and Professional Regulation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi € The post An employee’s professional online presence beyond the workplace appeared first on Regulating for Globalization. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals concluded that in Miller’s case the regulation had not been inappropriately applied retroactively.The court’s rationale in Miller: "where the requirements for engaging in specified professional activity are changed to govern future professional eligibility, a statute does not operate retroactively in any true sense even though its application may be triggered by an event which occurred prior to its effective date. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Dohme v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
” Citing a related case in a different regulated profession in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, the Discipline Committee effectively stated, [20] Professionals in every walk of life have private lives and should enjoy, as much as possible, the rights and freedoms of citizens generally. [read post]
