Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Social Services" Results 1 - 20 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2007, 2:43 pm
In its recent decision, South Carolina Dept. of Social Services v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 6:10 pm by alexkorotkin
Op. 08579 (2nd Dept. 2009), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "social abandonment" of one spouse by the other, does not meet the definition of constructive abandonment, and can not be used as grounds for divorce. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
The statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit is not tolled by a dismissed probationer’s pursuing his or her opportunity to seek an administrative review of the determinationKahn v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 01098, Court of Appeals [Decided with Nash, v New York City Dept. of Educ.] [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"  It also disagreed with Petitioner's contention that Justice Center's regulation 14 NYCRR 700.13 conflicts with Social Services Law §494(1)(b), noting that the statute does not require that the ALJ's decision be final and binding upon Justice Center. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Santa Clara County Dept. of Social Services, Ms. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the positionMatter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 09517, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, ThirdNew York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Griggs County Social Services, 499 N.W.2d 876 (N.D. 1993); Department of Income Maintenance v. [read post]