Search for: "Doe v. Forrest" Results 61 - 80 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” The New York courts have consistently interpreted the law narrowly and the Appellate Division held in September 2016 that the Grand Theft Auto V video game, “does not fall under the statutory definitions of ‘advertising’ or ‘trade. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:56 am by Benjamin Wittes
District Judge Katherine Forrest pointed to the potential consequences of such authority, citing a dissent in Korematsu v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:04 pm
  This was recently upheld in the case of Jay Lange v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]