Search for: "Doe v. General Services Admin." Results 221 - 240 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
CM: For the vaccine example, the main agency I was looking at is the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 Likewise, in the high-profile judicial review of the decision to release the notorious rapist John Worboys, R (DSD and NBV) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin); [2018] WLR(D) 195, the Divisional Court provided a five page summary via the Judiciary website. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Galen Marsh. 30-year old Galen Marsh joined Morgan Stanley in 2008 as a sales assistant, later becoming a customer service associate and then in 2014 a financial advisor. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
However, recognizing that the proposed Amendment remedies are merely a short-term solution, Part V, also reprinted below, questions the compatibility of speculative invoicing with copyright law’s underlying goals and purposes, and makes some arguments in favor of systemic reform of copyright law more generally, an issue with which Questioncopyright.org is intimately familiar. ... [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
They are searchable, but for obvious reasons it will generally be hard to find a particular case if one does not know under what anonymised initials the order has been published. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  “Section 502(b)(2), however, does not mean that interest ceases to accrue or that a debtor is exonerated therefrom. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Gordon Firemark
“If there is no knowledge requirement, does a copyright holder need to show that a service provider possesses ‘something more than the ability to remove or block access to materials posted on a service provider’s website’ in order to have the right and ability to control infringement? [read post]