Search for: "Doe v. General Services Admin."
Results 141 - 160
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The issue came out of the Judicial Review of the admission policies of a state faith school run by JFS, [2008] EWHC 1535 (Admin), [2008] EWHC 1536 (Admin). [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
What does it do for TM? [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
The Legal Services Commission and Another [2012] EWHC 794 (Admin) Law Society fails in Judicial Review of Government’s abolition of legal representative fee for committal proceedings. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
A: I could go back and look; my sense is that generally it’s when the other guy does something that’s too close that they register and sue. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
But what does that mean? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
But what does this actually mean? [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Downey, General Counsel, Bronx, NY (Toni Ann Hollifield of counsel), for respondent New York State Division of Human Rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Downey, General Counsel, Bronx, NY (Toni Ann Hollifield of counsel), for respondent New York State Division of Human Rights. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
For example, the government has special contracting priorities for veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs) and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs), as well as women-owned small businesses (WOSBs) and economically-disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSBs), and others, like the 8(a) business development program and small businesses more generally. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1894 (Admin) (19 July 2011) Sun and Daily Mail get £15,000 contempt fines for publishing online picture of defendant with gun during his criminal trial. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
Therefore, the proceedings in the ET were a nullity (the ET following the High Court decision in HM Attorney General v Edwards [2015] EWHC 1653 Admin). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
The short version is that the SCOV majority does not agree. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:03 am
Admin. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
Google (FOSS Patents) Google – Oracle v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
(2) The Cal Supremes did initially set up their own gloss for the administrative exemption that sounded initially promising, but ultimately does not really provide much guidance. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Krawitz has suffered injury-in-fact because he must shoulder a financial cost for services he could otherwise obtain free of charge from the VA. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Krawitz has suffered injury-in-fact because he must shoulder a financial cost for services he could otherwise obtain free of charge from the VA. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:01 am
Office of Admin. [read post]
