Search for: "Doe v. Gormley" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an individual knew the alleged offending conduct was prohibited and he or… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
East Donegal Co-Operative v AG provides the classic statement. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gormley v Estabrook  2017 NY Slip Op 32021(U)  September 25, 2017  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 805236/16, Judge Martin Shulman tells us that: “Contrary to Gormley’s claim, RadNet has established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgmerit dismissing the complaint by submitting Linden’s sworn affidavit. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Gormley, Using dynamic petroleum contract clauses to manage risk in volatile marketsEmmanuelle Cabrol, Pren Nreka v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
See Gormley v Robertson, 120 Wash.App. 31, 83 P.3d 1042 (2004) in which a Washington appellate court affirmed a trial court's application of the doctrine and distribution of the property acquired during the relationship between the two women. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
However, it does challenge existing Irish case-law, including the October 2009 judgment in McD v L, in which the Irish Supreme Court found that ‘de facto’ same-sex couples did not enjoy family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention.Small steps forward! [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
Matter remanded for consideration of issues raised but not determined ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, GOVERNMENT BENEFITS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW In the Matter of Gormley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The most recent jury award for damages that we are aware of was in 2012 for £80,000 (Gormley v Sinn Fein, unreported, NIQB, 14 December 2012.), with judicial damages over recent years tending to be more modest again (£48,750 in Elliot v Flanagan [2016] NIQB 8 and £50,000 in Coulter v Sunday Newspapers [2016] NIQB 70, although the l [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Northern Ireland:  A High Court jury has found that Sinn Fein defamed Declan Gormley, a former director of NI Water in respect of two press releases it issued in support of his sacking from the board. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:12 am by Eoin Daly
While O’Connell is certainly correct in relation to human rights law, as readily demonstrated in the not dissimilar scenario considered in Pichon and Sajous v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
WAPF does not make this distinction when promoting the safety of raw milk. [read post]