Search for: "Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
Green Thumb Floral & Garden Ctr., Inc., No. 2020-Ohio-5614 (Ohio Sup. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Feb. 25, 2021) * * * BONUS COVERAGE #1: Atari Interactive Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
’” See Barcelona.com, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
One such giant facing a recent challenge to its widely recognized trademark is Google, which posed an interesting question to all trademark holders.The case in question is Elliot v Google Inc, where the claimant, David Elliot, registered over 760 different domain names combining the word 'Google' and another brand or a famous person, for example googledisney.com, or with generic terms such as googletvnews.com. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Woo Lae Oak, Inc; Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 6:46 am
MySpace and Ninth Circuit’s Internet Brands rulings. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
Trademark * Viacom Int’l Inc v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
I argue in an earlier article and in an amicus brief joined by trademark and internet law professors that the doctrine is misguided for reasons highlighted in the oral argument.Like the recently decided Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:14 am
In Chocolat Lamontagne v Humeur Groupe Conseil inc[3], the Court concluded that the defendant’s purchase of the keywords “Chocolat Lamontagne” from an internet search engine for comparative advertising purposes did not constitute unfair competition. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:14 am
In Chocolat Lamontagne v Humeur Groupe Conseil inc[3], the Court concluded that the defendant’s purchase of the keywords “Chocolat Lamontagne” from an internet search engine for comparative advertising purposes did not constitute unfair competition. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
Allegations That Designer Wedding Dress Line Constitutes A Relevant Product Market Found Implausible
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am
Alfred Angelo, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Maggs again references Kaspersky's obligations as an “organizer of the dissemination of information on the Internet. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Turn again Whittingdale – and does Razzle Dazzle? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
Today, Canada’s Supreme Court upheld a worldwide interlocutory injunction against Google in Google Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
