Search for: "Doe v. KPMG, LLP" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:23 pm
The main arguments of the motion turn on defendant KPMG LLP of the US: If Belgium lacks jurisdiction over this part of KPMG (as opposed to fellow defendant KPMG of Belgium) and, because in Belgium civil litigation can only commence after the criminal proceedings have been concluded and KPMG US is not a party to these criminal proceedings, it is therefore unlikely all parties to the current action will also be subject to the action once referred (original… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Heidi A. Nadel
KPMG LLP, 453 F.3d 1, n.5 (1st Cir. 2006) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary).What's Happening with Merrimack College v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Heidi A. Nadel
KPMG LLP, 453 F.3d 1, n.5 (1st Cir. 2006) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary).What's Happening with Merrimack College v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Heidi A. Nadel
KPMG LLP, 453 F.3d 1, n.5 (1st Cir. 2006) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary).What's Happening with Merrimack College v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:11 am
KPMG LLP, et alNEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenant Established Substantial Residential Use Of Units to Satisfy Requirements of Loft LawLittle West 12th St. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Repeated assurances by attorneys that they provided accurate advice and that they did nothing wrong do not constitute continuous representation, particularly where there exists no mutual understanding to maintain a professional relationship (Arnold v KPMG LLP, 543 F Supp 2d 230, 236 [SD NY 2008], affd334 Fed Appx 349 [2d Cir], cert denied 558 US 901 [2009] [applying New York law]). [read post]