Search for: "Doe v. Klein" Results 61 - 80 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by David Klein
As our readers are aware, a flurry of eavesdropping lawsuits have been filed in the wake of the Ninth Circuit decision in Javier v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:14 am by Steven Cohen
Klein does not explain what the reasonable standard of care with respect to suicide prevention in prisons is, and he does not explain how the prison in this case deviated from those standards. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
Truthfully, Justice Klein's holding is a little more narrow, and (entirely properly) holds that even if the film itself does address a public issue, the particular cause of action at issue in the litigation -- allegedly defaming Troy Dyer and portraying him in an actionable false light -- doesn't itself concern a public issue and hence doesn't give rise to an anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The migration of credit card operations to South Dakota and Delaware began with the Supreme Court's decision in Marquette National Bank v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That the Kleins may do something in the future is not sufficient to state actual damages nor does it show that plaintiff was negligent (Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261, 261, 744 NYS2d 664 (Mem) [1st Dept 2002] [finding that pending foreclosure actions meant plaintiffs had not yet sustained any actual damages]). [read post]