Search for: "Doe v. Lyft, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am by Nassiri Law
Gavin Newsom’s signature – would expand the definition of “independent contractor” to more closely match that which was outlined in last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says these rules do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Vugo, Inc. v. [read post]
  The new law, which goes into effect on January 1, 2020, codified and expands the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Barry Winograd
The Railway Labor ActWhat relevance does the Railway Labor Act (RLA) have to the transportation exemption under the FAA? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  But technology does not differentiate the companies’ business from other operations in the livery industry. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm by Barry Sookman
Uber Technologies Inc., 2018 ONSC 718 Meyer v Uber Technologies, Inc. 868 F.3d. 66 (2nd.Cir.2017) Applebaum v Lyft, Inc, 263 F.Supp. 454 (June 26, 2017) Ramos v Uber Tech., Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 28162 (May 31, 2018) Cedrom-SNI inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:49 am by Brian Casillas
Notably, AB 2257 does not provide exemptions for workers in the rideshare industry such as Lyft and Uber. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
” The question is whether the “personal injury” language from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]