Search for: "Doe v. Lyft, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
However, the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Adolph v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:28 pm
Lyft, Inc., 2018 WL 6250661 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
The ABC Test of Employee Misclassification The 2019 law was designed to codify a 2018 California Supreme Court ruling, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:50 am
Keyword Ads * Altinex Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:50 pm
” The decision referred to is Alexander v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:50 pm
” The decision referred to is Alexander v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Lyft, Inc., No. 20-15689 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am
Bonus EDNY track: Starke v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 11:55 am
” Olson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
As our Orange County employment attorneys can explain, what this law does is codify last year’s California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
Additional Resources: Tan and Lawson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
See Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:16 pm
See Lyft, Inc., UI Hearing Nos. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Shipt, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-05858 (N.D. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Lyft, Inc.) [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 5:09 pm
AB5 expanded the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:30 am
Lyft, Inc., 2019 WL 5682826 (E.D. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:37 pm
But in its 2001 decision in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:18 am
TVEyes, Inc. [read post]
