Search for: "Doe v. Markham" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
Markham (2d Cir. 1945) 148 F.2d 737, 739; see also In re David V. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 23, 27 [rejecting Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of “wear” as partially inconsistent with “modern American usage”].) [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
The summaries were prepared by Shea Denning, Jamie Markham, Chris Tyner, Gabrielle Supak, and Jonathan Holbrook. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
With a smartphone in every pocket, and easy access to the law in every home, when does independent research by a juror become sufficient for a mistrial? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm by emagraken
(Markham, Ont: LexisNexis, 2006) at 12-51 as follows: Under SCR 1961, M.R. 370rr, only the examination of a person who was an officer or servant of the corporation at the time of trial could be used as evidence. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Susannah Tredwell
The new edition does not make any changes quite as dramatic as in the previous edition; if you were reading SLAW four years ago, you may remember there was a strong reaction to the removal of periods from citations. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:41 am by emagraken
(Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada Inc., 2011) at p. 705. [27] The duty of an occupier is now governed by s. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am by Bob Farb
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am by Bob Farb
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]