Search for: "Doe v. Mississippi State University et al" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  ”Kim Kreis, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
Either way, you might like to have some resources handy to help you understand the context of the case.Good Overviews  Laurie Sobel et al., Abortion at SCOTUS: Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Elliot Setzer
Waldrip, et al, Judge Jonathan Kobes held that the act’s definition of “boycotting Israel” relates solely to commercial activities. [read post]
Election-Related Synthetic Content Laws: Alabama (HB 172), Arizona (SB 1359), Colorado (HB 1147), Florida (HB 919), Hawaii (SB 2687), Mississippi (SB 2577), and New York (A 8808) enacted laws regulating the creation or dissemination of AI-generated election content or political advertisements, joining Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and other states that enacted similar laws in late 2023 and early 2024. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 9, 2011 Liberty University, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am by Miriam Seifter
  (By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm by Chris Castle
Other relevant reading should include Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al (2012). [read post]