Search for: "Doe v. Oregon State University et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The following is the text of a memo from the Disability Rights Legal Center on its recently filed case Brody et al v California, that aims to expand end-of-life choice to include the option of aid in dying.Background Mentally competent terminally ill patients may find themselves trapped in a dying process they find unbearable, even with excellent pain and symptom management. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
A “Class of One” is not available to an individual in litigation involving a public employer Appel v Spiridon et al, 531 F.3d 138* A faculty member employed by Western Connecticut State University [WCSU] was told that she would be required to submit to a medical examination involuntarily as a condition of her being continued in her employment with the University. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Wireless LLC, et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply brief Brief amicus curiae of Oregon et al. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Windy City Innovations, LLC, Nos. 2018-1400 et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
” I am an Emeritus Professor at Rutgers University and at Cornell University. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
The FDA and state and local regulatory officials traced the romaine lettuce to 23 farms and 36 fields in the Yuma growing region. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
On October 15, state members of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service unilaterally issued recommendations for expanding the universal service fund (USF) contribution base. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IPKat) Open Rights Group video on proposed term extension of sound recordings (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Lessig) Does ACTA secrecy violate European law? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Wade, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Amicus Curiae State of Oregon. [read post]
