Search for: "Doe v. Schneider" Results 81 - 100 of 274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although the complaint does not allege any cognizable pecuniary damage to decedent’s estate, plaintiff Hardie Stevens’s affidavit corrects that deficiency by identifying several categories of damages to the estate, including increased taxes and legal fees (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]; Rudolf, 8 NY3d at 443; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since an attorney-client relationship does not depend upon a formal retainer agreement or upon payment of a fee, the court must look to the words and actions of the parties (Moran v Hurst 32 AD3d 909, 911 (2d Dept 2006)). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Katherine Shaw
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc., 263 F.3d 816, 819 (8th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:48 am by admin
Commissioner, 84 T.C. 203 (1985) and Schneider v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  Then again, HB 86 may make Schneider’s gamble a good one:  the only way she does worse is if the judge imposes consecutive sentences, and that now requires making findings of fact that could prove problematic in Schneider’s case. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Laing, 43 AD3d 713, 715 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
Joe Schneider of Bloomberg News discusses the upcoming case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:40 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court today, for the first time, will consider what is the correct test in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schneider: her 3 points are her ideas. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]