Search for: "Doe v. Selective Service System"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
Long before Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
Pg. 21 [11] New York State Unified Court System 2018 Annual Report, pdf pg. 10. [12] (New York) Unified Court System FY 2022 Budget Request [13] Florida Rules of Judicial Administration [14] Florida Courts Court Funding & Budget [15] Wikipedia – Derek Chauvin [16] Toronto ‘chair girl’ sentenced to $2K fine, probation, community service [17] ‘We’re in trouble’: Advocates urge Ottawa to help close the access-to-justice gap [18] Louis… [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
If the Pentagon sticks to its new policy on women in combat, I think it’s likely that some male plaintiff will bring a new challenge to the selective service registration system, and that plaintiff will have a good chance of succeeding. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 2:34 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
Healthnow New York Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:52 pm
The court rejected Culhane’s argument that MERS did not legally hold the mortgage so it could not assign it, reasoning that nothing in Massachusetts mortgage law prohibited splitting the note and mortgage as the MERS system does. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
The current legislation authorizing the draft, the Military Selective Service Act, does not even allow women to register voluntarily. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Education Law §3013(2) provides as follows: "Whenever a trustee, board of trustee, board of education or board of cooperative educational services abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Education Law §3013(2) provides as follows: "Whenever a trustee, board of trustee, board of education or board of cooperative educational services abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
In its memo supporting its motion to dismiss, the government reportedly cited the Rostker case and a a 1984 SCOTUS case — Selective Service System v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
” Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Selection of an eligible from a list resulting from a competitive examination is typically based on the so-called “rule of three” currently set out in §61.1 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
