Search for: "Doe v. South Carolina" Results 121 - 140 of 1,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 10:29 am by Jack Pringle
South Carolina's Proposed LawIn December of last year, Representative Kirkman Finlay prefiled  H4371. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am by Jack Pringle
South Carolina's Proposed LawIn December of last year, Representative Kirkman Finlay prefiled  H4371. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:56 am by Mike Underwood
But, if the NLRB does not postpone the effective date, it will expect employers to post by April 30, with the possible exception of employers in the jurisdiction of the South Carolina District Court. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:51 am by Brian A. Comer
My article entitled "Products Liability Claims in South Carolina: What Exactly Does Essentially the Same Condition Mean? [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:55 pm by Gregory Forman
Taylor unwittingly exposes serious flaws in South Carolina’s Family Court Rules–specifically the notice provision for rules to show cause and the ability of family court judges to alter custody or visitation as part of a contempt proceeding. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:01 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
This week, the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned a 1979 decision, under which parents could be ordered to contribute to their children's college expenses. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
The following is a brief overview of the Workers' Compensation system here in South Carolina:From South Carolina Workers' Compensation Law Annotated 2008, pp. v-vi. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:47 am by Gregory Forman
Prior to Troxel, South Carolina’s grandparent visitation statute unduly interfered with a parents liberty interests in raising their children without unwarranted government intervention. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Jack Pringle
” The Fourth Circuit (which of course includes South Carolina) reiterated the Marek rule last month in Bosley v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
The motion to dismiss was based on the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 1996 decision in Carolina Chemical Equipment Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by James Hamilton
In a case involving the assets of the Republic of Argentina being subject to creditors, the State of South Carolina and 20 other states urged the U.S. [read post]